2013年2月3日 星期日

中天電視2/1核四辯論錄影

本人於2月1日於中天電視(52台)"台灣顧問團"節目參與二對二之核四/能源辯論,錄影己公布於中天網頁,網址附,歡迎觀賞。

http://blog.ctitv.com.tw/TWconsultant/archive/2013/02/01/n-21.aspx


中天電視每週五討論核四相關議題,如有興趣,可在下午2時觀賞直播或日後至該公司網頁觀賞

8 則留言:

  1. 陳董講的很好,不過看得出來很急的想要解釋目前台灣能源結構上的問題, 另外賴正庸主秘很明顯的對電力知識有很大的缺乏,基載與備用容量的觀念都是錯的,當他說到用風力發電來當基載時,只能苦笑搖頭了!台灣目前最大的問題,就是錯誤資訊太多,環保團體理盲而濫情!

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 代表反核界參加電視辯論人士的水準都還如此低下,反映了反核人士因對電力知識貧乏而反核的可悲事實。

      刪除
  2. 臺灣目前用電結構有七成來自工業用電,
    而電子產業又身為臺灣產業龍頭,
    我相信大多數電子產業依然是以自動化生產線來作為主要生產力,
    即便將來臺灣人口為負成長,
    對於需要用電的自動化生產線根本無關,
    說句白話一點的,
    人口變少根本不會降低目前用電結構佔七成的工業用電

    回覆刪除
  3. I can't believe the most stupid examples given by 賴正庸主秘 for his arguments. I feel sorry for you. I wish the other side could be represented by a more professionally qualified people. This is a very serious issue and I hope you can be challenged by a more professionally articulated presenter not like 賴正庸 !

    回覆刪除
  4. this is a very serious issue, the other side should be represented by a more professionally qualified people so that you could be challenged in a very professionally manner.I can't believe what I heard from 賴正庸主秘 the examples he used is just so ridiculous. but it may be just what most people can understand. it is sad. Power plant took years to build and it is not the same as car that you can buy within a few days if you feel you need a big one for unexpected passengers.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. To be honest, I was shocked by his ignorance. I'm expecting a worthy challenger instead of someone like him.

      刪除
  5. 陳先生您好
    看了您的部落格與電視辯論,解答了不少疑惑。也許無知不是最可怕,一知半解所造成的恐慌,才是無止境的蔓延。

    回覆刪除